![]() |
| Source: http://bit.ly/1lPie1g |
But before I begin, let me lay down two important premises.
Premise 1: I am a Christian. I love and believe in God; and I also believe in the authenticity of the Bible as God's Word.
Premise 2: I do not claim to know all the answers. I probably even have more questions than answers; and I'm with this piece, trying to put some structure to my jumbled thoughts. So, biko, follow through with me. And if by any chance you get more confused after reading..well, welcome to the club :D
Now, the title is not just a marketing ploy. I mean every word. Think about it for a second...is the Bible really complete? Now, I'm not about to argue some faith-based circular reasoning that says 'The Bible is complete because the Bible says so' (pls refer to premise 1). Logic 101 tells me there's something inherently wrong with that line of reasoning. I strongly believe God gave us our minds to think and reason things out for ourselves, especially for things that are right out there in the open. And I consider this topic to be one of those things we should think about.
First, who wrote the Bible? Men did. Yes, you heard me. Men wrote the Bible. Largely inspired by God, yes, but penned down by the hands of men. From the historical early books, to the prophetical, the biographical, the letters, and to the revelational, men were those God used to write words that we call the Bible today. This fact is important.
Second, I don't think God sat down one day to say: Hmm..I think I need to author a book, and I'll solidly call it 'The Bible!' (ghen gheunn!!). I sincerely doubt that. In the days of Jesus, what we call the Old Testament were different and distinct books often referred to as 'Scriptures', which loosely means 'Writings'. Just imagine a white-bearded, Gandalf-looking, old man with a crooked walking stick called Isaiah (the old man is called Isaiah, not his walking stick - in case you read that wrong :p), writing down in Hebrew some prophesies that God revealed to him, and finally wrapping up these writings in a scroll for safe keeping. Now, also imagine a young lad in the bush tending to sheep and once in a while writing down poetry on a papyrus sheet and squeezing it into his tunic the moment he sees a hungry bear yawning and prancing towards his sheep to feed (Lool! Too dramaic?) Now imagine a very wise and wealthy king consumed out of deep love (and lust?) for some voluptuous babe(s?) and pens down how much he loves her body and wants to get into bed with her, coupled with his fantasies of her wanting him too (This particular book started with King Solomon Randy asking for a frenchkiss! Naughty, naughty King Solomon. Lool! Go read it from The Message Bible, if you don't believe me). Now fastforward a couple of centuries and imagine a filty, beaten prisoner with shackles on his hands and feet, dictating a letter to a friendly slave, who scribbles what the prisoner says and sends out the letter to his former master named Philemon.
These scenarios are exactly how the Bible was written. Men were the ones, in much later years, who decided to compile these different writings into one volume called 'The Bible'. I won't bother you with the history and controversy behind this compilation...Google (much unlike the Nigeria Police) is your friend here.
Third, and here is the clincher: The Bible is over 2,000 years old, with the earliest books written as far back as 3,500 years ago! Did God stop speaking somewhere along the line? Or do we have everything we would possibly need scribbled in 66+ holy books? Some would argue 'Yes we do!' I won't argue. I'll tell you what I think.
I think there is more to the Bible than the compilation of ancient writings.
So, the question is, if the Bible is incomplete, as I'm postulating, what then completes the Bible?
Two things:
- If (notice how there has been too many 'ifs' in this piece?) God speaking to his prophets in ancient times and other interesting activities people decided to pen down, make up what we call the Bible, then it takes no rocket scientist to see the missing link in today's world. Books! There are a million and three solid, God-inspired books out there that are valid extensions of the Bible. God still speaks to his prophets, pastors, etc, who in turn write down what God has said. And I'm not talking just about spiritual or 'prophetic' books. I also mean the everyday inspiring books written by everyday people that inspire and motivate us to be better. Considering the fact that people like David, Solomon, Ruth, Job and the likes weren't prophets but wrote 'Scriptures' or had 'Scriptures' written about them, it goes to show that God can inspire everyday people too to write Bible extensions. Everyday people like you and me! Lool! (Of which, if you haven't read my God-inspired book, read it here. hehe...). And also, it means that everyday people can have books written about them inspire others. Now this is food for thought: Will your (auto)biography inspire people?
- Now the major difference between those old buggers two thousand years ago and now is this: God speaks to us directly! And this is a huge shift. You see, in those days, people like King David, etc used to rely on Prophets (and their writings) to hear from God or to understand the best course of action in any situation. but with the advent of the Holy Spirit, we have direct access to God and his Word. This implies that I can simply ask God for stuff (direction/help/understanding, etc) and trust that He'll answer. I'm not reducing the relevance of the Bible. I'm simply saying there's a difference between 'what God said', and 'what God is saying'. I call it situational relevance! And this, in my opinion, is final piece that completes the Bible. Think about it.
Update:
This piece came about from a conversation I had with Ada, and a question she asked. She has also asked that I give credit where credit is due. So, babe, here you go!

Love the part about situational relevance. So you think we have a The Bible: Vol. 2? :D
ReplyDeleteLOL! We already do. it's not just called The Bible :p
DeleteThanks for reading :)
great piece not as controversial as I expected...
ReplyDeleteLol! Thank you!
DeleteNice Jide! I agree that there are numerous extensions of the bible. And yes! God still speaks. Great read for me this morning. Not as controversial as I thought too lol.
ReplyDeleteWeldone!
Thank you! And thanks for reading too
DeleteNice read... had a good laugh too
ReplyDeleteHello.
ReplyDeletePlease can you clarify what exactly makes the Bible incomplete as you say? I'm still struggling to understand the premise of the post. Thanks.
The point is, God is still speaking today in varied form, that could easily form extensions of the Bible. Is this clear enough? Or is there some other parts that needs to be more explicit?
DeletePlease what do you define by "incomplete"? I've read the article several times but still can't see any definition of what" incomplete "means, so it's a bit challenging for me to understand how your two points show how the Bible will be completed.
DeleteDo you agree?
ReplyDeleteI disagree with your title but I agree with your content to a large extent. I understand the sense in which you intend to use the word 'incomplete', but I disagree that the Bible is incomplete, in every sense of the word. In other words, I do not agree that the valid points you have made points to the incompleteness of the bible. I will explain.
The word 'Bible' simply means 'The books'. Basically, it refers to a collection of books. At a point in time certain men came together and from among many books chose those which now make up the Bible. (Like you said, Google is a friendly resource for anyone interested in knowing more about this process). This might appear like a random act of some men but indeed, it was a divine act of God. So contrary to yours, I believe that God sat down one day and said "I need to author a book for mankind." Do bear in mind that the God of which we speak knows the end from the beginning. Knowing that He was going to one day author a book, inspired men from the beginning of time to write (history, (love)stories, (auto)biographies, instructions/laws, prophecies, poems and letters) and at the fullness of time inspired men to compile what He had inspired men to write. The fact that different men at different times in history wrote a book that has a flow and a singular (expatiate later) message is a pointer to its inspiration/author. I know you don't question the fact that the Bible was inspired by God's spirit and written through men, so I will not belabour that.
You rightly noted that the bible is filled with the stories and lives of ordinary men. I couldn't imagine what else it would be filled with. Paul, the Apostle, made us realize in 1 Corinthians 10:11, that the stories of the old testament (some of which he mentioned in the preceding verses) were written for our admonition/benefit. How could we benefit from the Bible if the accounts therein don't correlate with our experiences today? I believe you made the same point Paul, the Apostle, was making when you asked, "Will your (auto)biography inspire people?" We are meant to learn from the successes and failures of Bible characters, and then pattern our lives aright. No matter the situation we find ourselves, we can always glean wisdom or get direction from the Bible (other books aside for now; we will get to that later). The Bible is a book that is relevant to us now because whatever is happening or will happen, has already happened before. No wonder Jesus compared the times in which we now live to the time of Noah. As long as the world keeps going in cycles, the Bible will remain relevant and cannot be outdated. So, do we have everything we could possibly need scribbled down in 66 holy books? Read on!
After authoring the Bible, did God stop speaking? Very good question! Hebrews 1:1-2, "Going through a long line of prophets, God has been addressing our ancestors in several ways for centuries. Recently, he spoke to us directly through his son..."[MSG]. Basically, the writer of Hebrews was telling us that Jesus is the culmination of God's communication with man (read the quoted Bible passage further to get the gist). Hence, He (Jesus) is called The Word. When God spoke Jesus (or spoke through Jesus), He said all he needed to say to man. Indeed, the entirety of the Bible speaks of, and points to Jesus (That is what I meant by a singular message in my second paragraph. I will need to pen down a different write-up to expatiate further on that). Nevertheless, God has not stopped speaking. When Jesus was leaving the earth, He said He will send us the Holy Spirit (So Jide, you made a very valid point there).
To be continued...
Continued...
ReplyDeleteHe said the Holy Spirit will teach us all things. He said there were many things He wanted to tell His disciples but they would not be able to bear it at that point in time, but that the Holy Spirit whom He will send will guide them into all truth (remember, Jesus is the Truth). John 16. So there is so much to learn from the Holy Spirit and ultimately, the Spirit will be teaching us about Jesus - the person to whom the entire Bible refers.
So when you say, "instead of bristling through pages of the Bible to understand what to do, I can simply ask God and trust that He will answer", I disagree wholeheartedly with your APPROACH. Contrary to your assertions, you have by that statement rendered the Bible irrelevant and obsolete. The Bible is not what God said, it is what God is saying. And the Spirit is the person through whom He is speaking the words in the Bible. If a man decides to study the Bible without the help of the Spirit, he will only acquire head knowledge and we know that the letter kills (2 Corinthians 3:6). Also, if a man decides to follow the Spirit without any knowledge of the Bible, he is sure to go into error because the Spirit leads with the word and to the word (the Bible); for it is the sword of the Spirit (Ephesians 6:17). The spirit and the word work in tandem like the heart (circulation) and lungs (oxygenation). Both must be working at the same time for a man to be alive. Likewise, with an understanding of the Bible, we are able to put ourselves in check and clearly discern the leading/answers of the Spirit. And with the help of the Spirit, we are able to accurately apply the truths in Bible in different areas of our lives. The Spirit of God will never contradict the truths expressed in the Bible.
So where do we start from? The Bible! It is basic and foundational...and complete! On any matter of human endeavor (spirituality, christian service, secular service, academics, business, finance, marriage, sex, parenting, family, leadership, politics/governance, etc) in which you seek direction/answers, find out what the Bible has to say about it FIRST (and believe me, it has something to say, because it is complete...*smiles*), trusting the Spirit to grant you understanding. Then you can devour any other inspirational material...I mean, books! (This is where they come in). You might ask, "Is it not possible to understand the Bible by reading a book?" Oh, yes, its possible. Like Jide said, there are many inspired writings out there that you should read and benefit from. However, these writings are not additions that complete the Bible. At best, they will explain the Bible but they cannot complete it because it is not deficient in any way. So be careful! Do not judge the Bible by any book. Rather, judge every book by the Bible. In these times in which we live, many will be easily deceived. And potent deception does not out-rightly contradict the truth; it's a mixture of both lies and truth. So we need an accurate understanding of the Bible to clearly delineate issues. Hebrews 4:12.
Apologies for this lengthy script. I started this write-up with the question that ended Jide's own. My intentions being to write "The Bible is incomplete (Bible Musings Part II)...Lol! Jide, don't worry, I relinquish the copyright to you.
Me.
Excellent! You have completely addressed my reservation about this post. Your words are just kinder than mine.
DeleteMy previous questions above your post were meant to get the writer to fully explain his thought process. The Bible is complete in that it contains all that we need to pursue a relationship with God and fulfil His commandments.
I'm sorry but this was lazily written and not well though out at all.
Wow!!! Amazing stuff! This got me laughing so hard! And thinking harder! Very apt and instructive. Thank you for taking the time to respond. I very much appreciate the maturity displayed in your words.
DeleteI see we agree on multiple points and disagree on a few. I'll only touch on 'the few'. First, I'm not sure Hebrews 1 can be interpreted as you said. And I have read it in various versions. I believe that chapter points to the Authority and Supremacy of Jesus, which, if my knowledge of the Scriptures serve me well, is the entire premise of the book of Hebrews. Now, interestingly, this particular scenario/discussion touches the topic of my Bible Musings Part III, but I won't let the cat out of the bag yet...(notice how I have already given your response the highly exalted position of Bible Musings Part II? :D)
Now, with my 'bristling through the pages of the Bible' statement, I realise how misleading the statement is. I, in no way, desire to render the Bible of little/no effect or obsolete. I have removed this bit in the original text, so it doesn't get misconstrued further. To be clear, my approach isn't to ignore the Bible, but to complement God's Word with God's Spirit, which you have aptly explained.
That said, I'm still not convinced about the Bible completeness discussion.
I would love to place a name to the writeup though. You can send me an email at olatunbode@gmail.com. I would love to hear from you directly. And I would also love to feature you on this blog again, on the topic you alluded to writing.
Thanks again!
And to my 'other' Anonymous commenter, isn't it interesting how you choose to remain unkind?
DeleteI am glad my comments made you laugh and think. I agree with you that the book of Hebrews speaks of the authority and supremacy of Jesus. However, in order to establish that point, the writer of Hebrews started by telling us that God had been speaking to man in different ways but He now speaks to us through His son (Jesus). This tells us how God now speaks and I think it is relevant in answering the question, "Did God stop speaking after authoring the Bible?" That verse buttresses the fact that God has spoken, and does speak through Jesus. Then I went on to write about the Holy Spirit whom Jesus sent, who now speaks to us and leads us to Jesus (All Truth). I hope you get my point? I was building a point using the first verse in Hebrews and not the whole book of Hebrews.
ReplyDeleteThanks for accepting my write-up as part II of Bible Musings and also for editing your original text where you saw reason. These lend credence to the two premises with which you began your write-up. And as a result, I promise to check your blog at regular intervals and contribute as I am able. I look forward to reading part III. I do apologise because I will not be contacting you through the e-mail address you provided. Nevertheless, be rest assured that I remain anonymously yours.
Me.
Fair enough. :)
DeleteThank you very much, and God bless you.
In my opinion, the bible is complete. I think it carnality to raise these kinds of arguments. Do not confuse baby christians into thinking the bible is not the standard. Revelations 22:18-19
ReplyDeleteArchbishop na miliki. Pope na enjoyment. Imam na gbaladun
ReplyDeleteBible na incomplete Ehn...rararararan...*saxophone plays on in the background*
Nothing can challenge faith. Not even faith itself. That's why people are ready to kill and die for what they do not understand.
Apart from the bible being incomplete...which it is for the reason Jide has said, and for the fact that the council of Nicea put together what seemed like ideas that lined up, whatever happened to the book of Enoch, Tobith, JaJasr, The Gospel according to Barnabas, Thomas etc??
Your faith can't sta d honest criticisms and observations. This is the very reason I hate faith! You've got evidence for things you cannot see.
Fascinating. I am sorry my words are misconstrued as being "unkind" but I still stand by them. You do not define what you mean by incomplete, which to me is a huge no no.
ReplyDeleteI just find it a shame that Christians would be so lazy I'm their analysis of the Bible. Any body who studied logic will see that the article makes this huge disconnect.
I'm sure that your article contains a very sophisticated argument. More sophisticated than I can understand.